Micah Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> It just occurred to me that this change breaks backward compatibility. >> It will break scripts that try to clean up after Wget or that in any >> way depend on the current naming scheme. > > It may. I am not going to commit to never ever changing the current > naming scheme.
Agreed, but there should be a very good reason for changing it, and the change should be a clear improvement. In my view, neither is the case here. For example, the change to respect the Content-Disposition header constitutes a good reason[1].
