I, for one, wouldn't be in too much of a hurry to make WUG part of the growing IIS dependent products. For one thing, once you've gone that way, you've lost anyone running anything else. For another IIS may change at any time, making your product dependent on the whims of Microsoft. (Still smarting from the release of Dos 3.11, Anyone else remember that?)
-----Original Message----- From: Mark Singh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 10:52 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [WhatsUp Forum] WUG and IIS Duane, At this point we do not have those filters. Our intention was to keep WhatsUp Gold's web files local to its own web server. So it is something that we would have to take a look at. I am sure our development team has been looking into this already. We saw the entry on the forum. I will bring it up in our next development meeting. Mark Singh Senior Engineer Ipswitch Technical Support -------------------------------------------- ___________<>< -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Duane Waddle Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 11:02 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [WhatsUp Forum] WUG and IIS At 4/7/2002 10:56 PM, you wrote: >Dear WhatsUp Technicians and Afeccionados, > >Does IPSwitch make (or have they considered making) ISAPI filters for the >WUG Web files? I would love to be able to browse WUG maps over the Internet >but am not comfortable using a cleartext password scheme without SSL to >access something as critical as network administration tools like WUG Web. > >It seems to me WUG might benefit from being built compatible with IIS - SSL >and Windows Authentication being just one class of perk - and this kind of >architecture could also free up the developers to focus on what WUG does >well - network monitoring - leaving web server development to Microsoft. > >If anything like this is available, or if anyone has any ideas on >workarounds for serving out WUG Web Maps in a more secure way, please let >me know. Using IIS as a foundation for What's Up seems far less secure than cleartext passwords.. Code Red anyone? In principle, however, SSL access to the What's Up web would be sweeet. One thing I'm working on in my abundant spare time is using STunnel (www.stunnel.org) to act as an SSL proxy server in front of What's up. The thing you lose this way is What's Up's per-IP address restrictions. (If using STunnel on a Unix box, you can substitute with libwrap) Hope this helps --D Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html to be removed from this list. An Archive of this list is available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/whatsup_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html to be removed from this list. An Archive of this list is available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/whatsup_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html to be removed from this list. An Archive of this list is available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/whatsup_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
