" I personally would like to see a bit more flexibility in the Web interface of WUG"
What type of flexibility? There were some large strides taken with the switch to templatized pages. ~Brian ----- Original Message ----- From: "Goodwin, Robert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:06 PM Subject: RE: [WhatsUp Forum] WUG and IIS > I am sure there will be a tirade of Anti Microsoft sentiment for a simple > statement of being able to deploy WUG using IIS. > > It would be nice to have WUG be able to deploy on any or a specific set of > Web Servers and those Web Servers being separate from the Main WUG machine. > > Most products that are web based have options to install on platforms other > that IIS and support IIS as well. > > This forum is about WUG not "I hate Microsoft" > > I personally would like to see a bit more flexibility in the Web interface > of WUG > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jay Drew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 8:58 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [WhatsUp Forum] WUG and IIS > > > For security reasons, I'd have to seriously consider another product if WUG > switched to using IIS. I'd accept WUG going to Apache, but never IIS. > > Jay Drew > LLNL > > At 09:17 AM 4/11/2002 -0400, you wrote: > >I, for one, wouldn't be in too much of a hurry to make WUG part of the > >growing IIS dependent products. For one thing, once you've gone that > >way, you've lost anyone running anything else. For another IIS may > >change at any time, making your product dependent on the whims of > >Microsoft. (Still smarting from the release of Dos 3.11, Anyone else > >remember that?) > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Mark Singh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 10:52 AM > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: RE: [WhatsUp Forum] WUG and IIS > > > > > >Duane, > >At this point we do not have those filters. Our intention was to keep > >WhatsUp Gold's web files local to its own web server. So it is > >something that we would have to take a look at. I am sure our > >development team has been looking into this already. We saw the entry > >on the forum. I will bring it up in our next development meeting. > > > >Mark Singh > >Senior Engineer > >Ipswitch Technical Support > >-------------------------------------------- > >___________<>< > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Duane Waddle > >Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 11:02 AM > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: Re: [WhatsUp Forum] WUG and IIS > > > >At 4/7/2002 10:56 PM, you wrote: > > > > >Dear WhatsUp Technicians and Afeccionados, > > > > > >Does IPSwitch make (or have they considered making) ISAPI filters for > > >the WUG Web files? I would love to be able to browse WUG maps over > > >the Internet but am not comfortable using a cleartext password scheme > > >without SSL to access something as critical as network administration > > >tools like WUG Web. > > > > > >It seems to me WUG might benefit from being built compatible with IIS > > >- SSL and Windows Authentication being just one class of perk - and > > >this kind of architecture could also free up the developers to focus > > >on what WUG does well - network monitoring - leaving web server > > >development to Microsoft. > > > > > >If anything like this is available, or if anyone has any ideas on > > >workarounds for serving out WUG Web Maps in a more secure way, please > > >let me know. > > > >Using IIS as a foundation for What's Up seems far less secure than > >cleartext passwords.. Code Red anyone? In principle, however, SSL > >access to the What's Up web would be sweeet. One thing I'm working on > >in my abundant spare time is using STunnel (www.stunnel.org) to act as > >an SSL proxy server in front of What's up. The thing you lose this way > >is What's Up's per-IP address restrictions. (If using STunnel on a > >Unix box, you can substitute with libwrap) > > > >Hope this helps > > > >--D > > > > > >Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html > >to be removed from this list. > > > >An Archive of this list is available at: > >http://www.mail-archive.com/whatsup_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ > > > > > >Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html > >to be removed from this list. > > > >An Archive of this list is available at: > >http://www.mail-archive.com/whatsup_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ > > > >Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html > >to be removed from this list. > > > >An Archive of this list is available at: > >http://www.mail-archive.com/whatsup_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ > > > Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html > to be removed from this list. > > An Archive of this list is available at: > http://www.mail-archive.com/whatsup_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ > > Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html > to be removed from this list. > > An Archive of this list is available at: > http://www.mail-archive.com/whatsup_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ > Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html to be removed from this list. An Archive of this list is available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/whatsup_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
