At 4/11/2002 08:17 AM, you wrote: I agree with you wholeheartedly. The _last_ thing I'd want to see is WUG depending on Insecure Information Server.
My wish list is SSL support for the web interface, and the ability to do TCP/IP content scans on SSL services. --D >I, for one, wouldn't be in too much of a hurry to make WUG part of the >growing IIS dependent products. >For one thing, once you've gone that way, you've lost anyone running >anything else. For another IIS may change at any time, making your product >dependent on the whims of Microsoft. (Still smarting from the release of >Dos 3.11, Anyone else remember that?) > >-----Original Message----- >From: Mark Singh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 10:52 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: RE: [WhatsUp Forum] WUG and IIS > > >Duane, >At this point we do not have those filters. Our intention was to keep >WhatsUp Gold's web files local to its own web server. So it is something >that we would have to take a look at. I am sure our development team has >been looking into this already. We saw the entry on the forum. I will >bring it up in our next development meeting. > >Mark Singh >Senior Engineer >Ipswitch Technical Support >-------------------------------------------- Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html to be removed from this list. An Archive of this list is available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/whatsup_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
