Could it be that the installation of snmp4w2k creates this event in the application 
log, by the key's it puts in to the registry? I have seen the same thing on my servers 
and turned that event off so it  wont be created any longer. 
//Niax

        -----Ursprungligt meddelande----- 
        Fr�n: Goran Jovanovic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
        Skickat: m� 2003-08-25 02:51 
        Till: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
        Kopia: 
        �mne: RE: [WhatsUp Forum] Strange Disk Free Problem
        
        

        I am having a lot of problems with my Win 2K Adv Server responding to
        SNMP quickly.
        
        Sometimes the query for free disk space comes back null and then if I
        leave it alone for a bit it comes back with the correct number (it has
        never come back with the wrong number).
        
        I did a restart of the SNMP service only and it seems to have somewhat
        stabilized now.
        
        ldiskPercentFreeSpace.2.68.58=41
        
        ldiskPercentFreeSpace.2.68.58=NULL
        
        First it reported 41% free space and then it does not respond???
        
        I installed SNMP4W2K-STD on the Win2K Adv server and now I am getting a
        lot of these error messages in the Application Event Log
        
        Event Type:     Error
        Event Source:   Perflib
        Event Category: None
        Event ID:       1010
        Date:           8/24/2003
        Time:           8:35:21 PM
        User:           N/A
        Computer:       TLS-FILE
        Description:
        The Collect Procedure for the "PerfOS" service in DLL
        "C:\WINNT\System32\perfos.dll" generated an  exception or returned an
        invalid status. Performance data returned by  counter DLL will be not be
        returned in Perf Data Block. Exception or  status code returned is data
        DWORD 0.
        Data:
        0000: 3d 01 00 00               =...   
        
        These errors are coming fast and furious every 4 seconds or so. I tried
        to unregister the DLL (which is where it says it should be) and get the
        error:
        
        Perfos.dll was loaded, but the DllUnregisterServer entry point was not
        found.
        
        And when I register it:
        
        Perfos.dll was loaded, but the DllRegisterServer entry point was not
        found.
        
        Something is broken on the server....
        
        
         
             Goran Jovanovic
             The LAN Shoppe
             2345 Yonge Street, Suite 302
             Toronto, Ontario M4P 2E5
             Phone: (416) 440-1167 x-2113
             Cell: (416) 931-0688
             E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        
        
        
        -----Original Message-----
        From: Mike Krygeris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
        Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2003 7:45 PM
        To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        Subject: RE: [WhatsUp Forum] Strange Disk Free Problem
        
        Try restarting the SNMP service on the server. If ICMP is fast, maybe
        it's
        the OS.
        
        
        -----Original Message-----
        From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Goran
        Jovanovic
        Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2003 5:52 PM
        To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        Subject: RE: [WhatsUp Forum] Strange Disk Free Problem
        
        I think I figured it out.
        
        I did check the OID with Net Tools | SNMP and it was returning the
        correct value but it was taking a long time to do it. Once I found and
        increased the SNMP timeout from 5 to 10 seconds it now reports properly.
        
        I do not understand why the server responds so slowly.
        
         
             Goran Jovanovic
             The LAN Shoppe
             2345 Yonge Street, Suite 302
             Toronto, Ontario M4P 2E5
             Phone: (416) 440-1167 x-2113
             Cell: (416) 931-0688
             E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        
        
        
        -----Original Message-----
        From: Mike Krygeris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
        Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2003 6:22 PM
        To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        Subject: RE: [WhatsUp Forum] Strange Disk Free Problem
        
        First use a MIB browser to check if the value is reporting anything on
        the
        "Down" server.
        I also would check the instance and value on the second server. You may
        find
        that it has a different instance altogether. If a server has only a C:
        drive, the instance will likely be different than one with a c: and a d:
        drive.
        When it comes to NT drive monitoring. You can never assume that a
        service
        that works on one server will work on another. Usually servicesa have to
        be
        created on a per server basis.
        
        HTH
        Mike Krygeris
        
        
        -----Original Message-----
        From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Goran
        Jovanovic
        Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2003 11:54 AM
        To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        Subject: [WhatsUp Forum] Strange Disk Free Problem
        
        Hi,
        
        I have setup WUG to monitor two of my server's C: drives to tell me if
        they are more than 80% full. I read the documents and found the OIDs to
        use and one server work fine and the other server doesn't work properly.
        
        I created a monitored SNMP service with OID
        1.3.6.1.4.1.311.1.1.3.1.1.5.1.3.2.67.58 I gave it a range of values from
        20 (low) to 100 (high). Then I assigned this service to two servers. One
        server has 26% free space and the other has 67% free space (from Net
        Tools below)
        
        ldiskPercentFreeSpace.2.67.58=26
        
        ldiskPercentFreeSpace.2.67.58=67
        
        The 26% server show service down in the map and the 67% server show
        service up on the map.
        
        Why? Did I do something wrong? Don't think so. It is the same service
        being monitored.
        
        The thing that I noticed as a difference is that the 67% comes back
        almost instantly while the 26% takes a good 5 seconds. Now the 67% is
        the WUG server that this is being run on while the 26% is another server
        on the local subnet. I have implemented SNMP4W2K-STD on both of these
        servers. The 26% is a Win2K Adv Server SP3 and the 67% is a Win2K Server
        SP4
        
        Does anyone have any thoughts on what might be the issue here?
        
        Thanx
        
         
             Goran Jovanovic
             The LAN Shoppe
             2345 Yonge Street, Suite 302
             Toronto, Ontario M4P 2E5
             Phone: (416) 440-1167 x-2113
             Cell: (416) 931-0688
             E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        
        
        
        Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
        to be removed from this list.
        
        An Archive of this list is available at:
        http://www.mail-archive.com/whatsup_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
        
        
        Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
        to be removed from this list.
        
        An Archive of this list is available at:
        http://www.mail-archive.com/whatsup_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
        
        Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
        to be removed from this list.
        
        An Archive of this list is available at:
        http://www.mail-archive.com/whatsup_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
        
        
        Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
        to be removed from this list.
        
        An Archive of this list is available at:
        http://www.mail-archive.com/whatsup_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
        
        Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
        to be removed from this list.
        
        An Archive of this list is available at:
        http://www.mail-archive.com/whatsup_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
        

<<winmail.dat>>

Reply via email to