|
See that is why I have asked
Ipswitch for years to make a top tier WUG server that could handle maps
reporting to it from the remote WUG servers. I was just thinking again on the
drive in this morning how I could do that since we have asp access. Man if I
could get that to work I would deploy 10 more installs in my regions. It would
just be remote WUG installs and a main WUG server with map links. The
trick is to make some kind of dependence setup to poll the regional router
before the map status would be displayed on the main WUG server. I don't think
it would be a big deal to replicate data.
Tv
-----Original
Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of John Ferguson Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 7:20 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [WhatsUp Forum] terminal server I have 32 remote boxes running WUG and I use Terminal Services (remote admin mode) to get to each of them with no problems at all. |
- [WhatsUp Forum] terminal server Glatt, Robert
- RE: [WhatsUp Forum] terminal server Hunt, Jim
- Re: [WhatsUp Forum] terminal server John Ferguson
- RE: [WhatsUp Forum] terminal server Mike Krygeris
- RE: [WhatsUp Forum] terminal server Anthony Valuikas
- RE: [WhatsUp Forum] terminal server Glatt, Robert
- RE: [WhatsUp Forum] terminal server Dan King
- RE: [WhatsUp Forum] terminal server Mike Krygeris
- RE: [WhatsUp Forum] terminal server Tate, Craig
- RE: [WhatsUp Forum] terminal server Mark_Raihl/MO/americancentury
- RE: [WhatsUp Forum] terminal server Chris Ohm
- Re: [WhatsUp Forum] terminal server Eivind Ravndal
- RE: [WhatsUp Forum] terminal server Chris Ohm
- RE: [WhatsUp Forum] terminal server Mark_Raihl/MO/americancentury
- Re: [WhatsUp Forum] terminal server Adrian Ferrier
