Le 22 nov. 2006 à 9:53, Alexey Feldgendler a écrit :
On Wed, 22 Nov 2006 20:42:11 +0600, Michel Fortin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So I propose a new <fcaption> elements -- for "figure caption" -- in
replacement for the <caption> element in my previous figure
construct:
<figure>
<fcaption>Caption Text</fcaption>
<img src="...">
</figure>
And if I were to propose a default styling for this, it'd be this
one:
figure { display: table; }
fcaption { display: table-caption; }
<figure> cannot be used like this:
[...]
Indeed, <figure> markup cannot express a full table -- but it doesn't
need to. Following CSS 2.1 [1], anonymous boxes are created for rows
and cells wherever appropriate. In the previous example, an anonymous
row and an anonymous cell are created to hold the content of the
figure. The figure effectively behave visually as a one-cell table
with a caption.
[1]: http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/tables.html#anonymous-boxes
It works pretty well in browsers that implement `display: table`. And
a not-so-bad fallback for browsers that do not implement the CSS
table display model (IE) is to display both <figure> and <fcaption>
as blocks, setting the width explicitly for floated figures (so that
the caption does not extend the box horizontally).
Michel Fortin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.michelf.com/
