Anne van Kesteren schrieb:
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 18:03:33 +0100, Julian Reschke
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The fact is that authors already try things like <div/>, <p/> and
even <a/>. I've seen all of those examples in the wild. See, for
instance, the source of the XML 1.0 spec (and many others) which
claim to be XHTML as text/html, littered with plenty of <a/> tags all
throughout.
...
Huh? The thing at <http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/>? Don't see that
problem there.
<h5><a name="IDANQDS" id="IDANQDS" />Names and Tokens</h5>
is one example...
If this was the case at an earlier point of time, it was probably
caused by a bug in their XSLT code, not the authors writing the spec
(which IMHO uses the W3C's xmlspec XML language).
In your humble opinion or is it just a fact? :-)
Aha. I thought it was about an "<a />" with no attributes.
So yes, that's a bug in the XSLT code (xmlspec.xsl). I'll forward this
info to Norman Walsh.
Best regards, Julian
