The DOCTYPE is required and it should be. That way, the text introduces itself and instructs the reader about the expected renderer (in absence of external metadata). I have seen several products (mail readers and proxies, on-line help systems, fora etc.) trying to interpret every text as HTML, even if that was not what the author intended. It is safer to interpret every text as plain, unless it starts with a DOCTYPE prologue. This is especially important with HTML fragments. Chris
- [whatwg] HTML as a text format: Should <title>... Øistein E . Andersen
- Re: [whatwg] HTML as a text format: Should <... Kristof Zelechovski
- Re: [whatwg] HTML as a text format: Should ... Ian Hickson
- Re: [whatwg] HTML as a text format: Sho... Michael Enright
- Re: [whatwg] HTML as a text format: Should <... Randy Drielinger
- Re: [whatwg] HTML as a text format: Should ... Michael Enright
- Re: [whatwg] HTML as a text format: Sho... Øistein E . Andersen
- Re: [whatwg] HTML as a text format:... Markus Ernst
