On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Michael A. Puls II <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 21 Sep 2009 16:30:29 -0400, Boris Zbarsky <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Of course, if the idea is to support deferring for images, <object> and >>> <embed> etc. and it's not desired that that support be given through >>> css, perhaps there should be some attribute that does that. <img >>> disabled> <object disabled> <embed disabled> etc. where .disabled = >>> false brings them alive. >> >> I would prefer something like this. Using CSS for this purpose seems >> wrong. > > Sounds good. If it is an attribute, I wonder what would be a good name. > 'disabled' might be likely to conflict with some plug-in param and might > conflict with <object> and <img> when they are form controls.
The obvious answer seems to be to use @hidden, which indicates that the element is not currently relevant and should not be displayed. ~TJ
