Yup, that's also my point of view :). Not many sites using panos, and the
future is WebGL
Just wanted to help a little where I think have some knowledge in.
Let's see what Ian has to say about all this.
greets
Leo
Am 31.08.2012, 14:05 Uhr, schrieb Odin Hørthe Omdal <odi...@opera.com>:
On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 11:55:31 +0200, Leo Willner <leo.will...@chello.at>
wrote:
To throw in my 5 cents:
If tour is just needed for panos we could do a <pano>-tag, for that we
need the distorted 360°-pano-image and do a rendering of it in the
browser into a 360°-pano.
But it's *really* not needed. This is such a small use case, and is
doable
already with canvas or other web features.
Advanced tours? WebGL.
Less advanced ones? Canvas, - or just images, css, transitions and
animations.
This is really something you can easily build with existing technologies.
