On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Timothy Hatcher <[email protected]> wrote: > It does look good to me, though I can't evaluate it from an implementation > perspective. I'll defer to others on that. > > Requiring the <img> also also forces backwards comparability for clients that > don't support <picture>. (As long as the author gives it a fallback src > attribute.) > > One part isn't clear to me yet: what <source> attribute is used for DPR > multipliers? Allowing both multipliers and intrinsic widths would be ideal > and flexible.
<source src> will contain a list of either url/density or url/size pairs. ~TJ
