> On Nov 20, 2013, at 10:42 AM, "Tab Atkins Jr." <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Timothy Hatcher <[email protected]> wrote: >> It does look good to me, though I can't evaluate it from an implementation >> perspective. I'll defer to others on that. >> >> Requiring the <img> also also forces backwards comparability for clients >> that don't support <picture>. (As long as the author gives it a fallback src >> attribute.) >> >> One part isn't clear to me yet: what <source> attribute is used for DPR >> multipliers? Allowing both multipliers and intrinsic widths would be ideal >> and flexible. > > <source src> will contain a list of either url/density or url/size pairs. > > ~TJ
Can it be srcset so <img srcset> is also usable for simple cases? (Yes respec srcset or anything not named src.) — Timothy Hatcher
