On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 10:57 AM, Timothy Hatcher <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Nov 20, 2013, at 10:42 AM, "Tab Atkins Jr." <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Timothy Hatcher <[email protected]> wrote: >>> It does look good to me, though I can't evaluate it from an implementation >>> perspective. I'll defer to others on that. >>> >>> Requiring the <img> also also forces backwards comparability for clients >>> that don't support <picture>. (As long as the author gives it a fallback >>> src attribute.) >>> >>> One part isn't clear to me yet: what <source> attribute is used for DPR >>> multipliers? Allowing both multipliers and intrinsic widths would be ideal >>> and flexible. >> >> <source src> will contain a list of either url/density or url/size pairs. > > Can it be srcset so <img srcset> is also usable for simple cases? (Yes respec > srcset or anything not named src.)
I don't have strong opinions on the name. ~TJ
