On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 10:37 AM, Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote: > Given all of the above, would you suggest changing the spec or the expected > test results?
You said "The expected results are an object that returns the original href, but empty values for all other properties. I don't see this behavior in the spec" but that is how the API works (more or less, protocol would return ":"). You'd have to explain in a little more detail what you think is wrong before I can answer this. >> Looking at the first of those >> http://intertwingly.net/stories/2014/10/13/urltest-results/eb3950fcc8 >> it seems something might be broken here on your end. > > Can you explain what you think is broken? It isn't completely obvious, but > the input string in that case contains U+200B, U+2060, U+FEFF: Sure, but 1) per IDNA those are ignored, and 2) urltestdata.txt does not contain the output you have for "whatwg". -- https://annevankesteren.nl/
