Hi Kevin,
> On Aug 5, 2017, at 9:19 PM, Kevin Marks <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> That use case sounds more like rel="canonical"
You weren't the only one (myself included) who thought that. Michael Nelson,
one of the authors if the identifier I-D, just wrote a blog post explaining why
not canonical:
http://ws-dl.blogspot.com/2017/08/2017-08-07-relcanonical-does-not-mean.html
I think I'm convinced that canonical isn't the right fit for what they are
talking about. But if rel=bookmark could be used in <link> elements I think it
would work better than a slightly similar, oddly named, link relation, which
IMHO is bound to cause confusion for web publishers.
//Ed
