Hi Kevin,

> On Aug 5, 2017, at 9:19 PM, Kevin Marks <kevinma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> That use case sounds more like rel="canonical"

You weren't the only one (myself included) who thought that. Michael Nelson, 
one of the authors if the identifier I-D, just wrote a blog post explaining why 
not canonical:


I think I'm convinced that canonical isn't the right fit for what they are 
talking about. But if rel=bookmark could be used in <link> elements I think it 
would work better than a slightly similar, oddly named, link relation, which 
IMHO is bound to cause confusion for web publishers.


Reply via email to