This sounds like what we use uid for in microformats - the url that you
want as the persistent identifier.
http://microformats.org/wiki/uid - it looks like you wrote this up a while
See u-uid in h-entry http://microformats.org/wiki/h-entry
On 8 Aug 2017 5:58 pm, "Ed Summers" <e...@pobox.com> wrote:
> Hi Kevin,
> > On Aug 5, 2017, at 9:19 PM, Kevin Marks <kevinma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > That use case sounds more like rel="canonical"
> You weren't the only one (myself included) who thought that. Michael
> Nelson, one of the authors if the identifier I-D, just wrote a blog post
> explaining why not canonical:
> I think I'm convinced that canonical isn't the right fit for what they are
> talking about. But if rel=bookmark could be used in <link> elements I think
> it would work better than a slightly similar, oddly named, link relation,
> which IMHO is bound to cause confusion for web publishers.