Hi
Korbinian Bachl wrote:
Hi Matej,
especially this:
"The immediate redirect from bookmarkable URL to hybrid URL should be
suppressed when a crawler (google, msn, ...) is detected "
is a 100% no go and will result in beeing banned by the search engine, as
its also known as "cloaking (modern spiders access your site under different
IPs and different IDs and if they detect different behaviours they know you
are cloaking)
I don't really think so. The only difference is that we don't redirect
to hybrid url, but stick to the original bookmarkable urls.
It just doesn't make sense for e.g. google to index hybrid url, if it
can index the original (bookmarkable) one. Although if this proves to be
a problem it would be very easy to turn this behavior off.
Anyway, no different content is served. It seem very unlikely that a
crawler would ban this.
this:
mounted
/context/my/page/class/param1/value1
/context/my/page/class/param1/value1[:<pageMap>] (colon before pagemap name
is intentional)
has to be put further:
mounted with normal PageParams:
/context/my/page/class/param1/value1
/context/my/page/class/param1/value1[:<pageMap>] (colon before pagemap name
is intentional)
mounted with IndexedPageParams:
/context/my/page/class/value1
/context/my/page/class/value1[:<pageMap>] (colon before pagemap name is
intentional)
It really doesn't make difference here whether the parameters are named
or indexed. It's a separate strategy which only parses the mounted urls.
i also dont understand your format ... why do we need these brackets [] ?
and why do we need a pagemap behind? cant this just go into the session?
No, it can't. It's just how wicket urls work. This is bookmarkable url.
It contains information on how to create page instance. And also it can
(optionally) contain information about in which pagemap the created page
should be stored.
-Matej
just my 2 cents,
Regards
Korbinian
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Matej Knopp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Samstag, 4. November 2006 13:56
An: [email protected]
Betreff: URL scheme for Wicket 2.0
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Proposal+of+
URL+scheme+for+Wicket+2
What do you think?
-Matej
