yeah if we start rewriting that also then 1.3 will pretty much be
2.0without constructor change??
are we really planning to backport/rewrite all that?

johan


On 11/7/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

all im saying is that it wont really be "backporting" more of a "rewrite"
without the object param change

-igor


On 11/7/06, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> There is... I profiled our app, and creating a flat model hierarchy
> can save quite some memory. Every layer of inheritance adds a
> reference to the super type, and takes 4 bytes (see the LDM thread for
> more information).
>
> Saving this on the models gives extra room in mem usage. Same would go
> for components, but there the difference in functionality is larger,
> and there are much more types.
>
> Even so, I'm not sure that the removal of the object parameter was the
> only idea behind  the flattening, it makes the hierarchy much cleaner.
>
> Martijn
>
>
> On 11/7/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > you mean things like removing the abstract compound model, etc?
> >
> > all that was done as part of removing the object param so without that
> there
> > is no point in backporting.
> >
> > -igor
> >
> >
> > On 11/7/06, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 11/7/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > i need some concrete examples here martijn! :) you think i
remember
> > > every
> > > > refactor i do?
> > >
> > > Press f4 on IModel in eclipse in your 2.x workspace, and do the same
> > > for the 1.x workspace. Notice the differences in hierarchy.
> > >
> > > > removing object will really break everything out there, so i don
> tknow
> > > if we
> > > > want to do that in 1.x branch
> > >
> > > We could make it a vote... But I share your concern. It is something
> > > that existing users need to vote on I guess. For them it will make
> > > moving to 2.0 a bit easier.
> > >
> > > Martijn
> > >
> > > > On 11/7/06, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On 11/7/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > you mean the removal of the object param?
> > > > >
> > > > > That would be cool too. Not sure if that is possible, however.
And
> > > > > further mostly flattening the hierarchy, so that it is
equivalent
> with
> > > > > 2.0
> > > > >
> > > > > Martijn
> > > > >
> > > > > > -igor
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 11/6/06, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 11/7/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > * IModel hierarchy improvements
> > > > > > > > whats that?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The simplifications in IModel hierarchy of 2.0 applied to
1.3
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > i.e. collapsing of models.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > You did it, don't you remember? :D
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Martijn
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > <a href="
http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket
> > > > > ">Vote</a>
> > > > > > > for <a href="
> http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/stuff/wicket
> > > > > > > ">Wicket</a>
> > > > > > > at the <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/";>Best
> Stuff
> > > in
> > > > > > > the World!</a>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket
> > > ">Vote</a>
> > > > > for <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/stuff/wicket
> > > > > ">Wicket</a>
> > > > > at the <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/";>Best
Stuff
> in
> > > > > the World!</a>
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket
> ">Vote</a>
> > > for <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/stuff/wicket
> > > ">Wicket</a>
> > > at the <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/";>Best Stuff
in
> > > the World!</a>
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket";>Vote</a>
> for <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/stuff/wicket
> ">Wicket</a>
> at the <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/";>Best Stuff in
> the World!</a>
>


Reply via email to