we need to keep the servlet in some shape or form for the osgi folks. the osgi spec doesnt support filters. so a servlet that is a think wrapper around our filter should do the trick.
-igor On 11/27/06, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I would be ok with removing it. Maybe Johan wants to confirm? Eelco On 11/27/06, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was giving the WicketFilter backport a shot, and I noticed that the > wicket servlet is completely gone from Wicket 2.x. > > Should we keep the servlet as a fallback for 1.x for existing > applications? Will that have an adverse effect on our maintenance? > > As a side note: I noticed that much of our documentation is > out-of-date regarding changed functionality in wicket-2.x. For > instance I see a lot of references to WicketServlet where Filter is > meant. Same goes for IWebApplicationFactory. I am able to fix most > obvious errors, but not all. > > Martijn > > -- > <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket";>Vote</a> > for <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/stuff/wicket ">Wicket</a> > at the <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/";>Best Stuff in > the World!</a> >
