On 3/8/07, Jean-Baptiste Quenot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* James McLaughlin:
> 9 weeks is definitley too long for current 2.0 users to wait
> before. We all know that 1 week in developer terms is 2 or 3
> human weeks, so this really leaves us high and dry with no
> viable codebase for a long period of time. I'm sure for most of
> us that means backporting to 1.3, then forwardporting again to
> 1.5. That will be really unpleasant -- please don't do that!
By reading your message, I'm under the impression that trunk will
suddenly collapse and disappear! Why do you have that feeling?
The code will remain as-is, you will still be able to work on your
projects, don't worry.
--
By reading this thread, I get the impression many wicket developers wish it
would :). Let's just say at best 2.0 will be on life-support and waiting to
be euthanized. The wicket developers are a creative and prolific bunch, so
I'll have the added frutstration of watching many excellent new features be
developed just beyond the glass in 1.x land. If that's what I wanted, I
would have stayed with 1.2. I've had enough of that as I have watched 2.0 be
abandoned over that past month or so in favor of 1.3
regards,
jim
Jean-Baptiste Quenot
aka John Banana Qwerty
http://caraldi.com/jbq/
