no you wont see any exciting new features being developed. we are going to concentrate on backporting all the good 2.0 stuff into 1.x before we work on anything new.
-igor On 3/8/07, James McLaughlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/8/07, Jean-Baptiste Quenot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > * James McLaughlin: > > > 9 weeks is definitley too long for current 2.0 users to wait > > before. We all know that 1 week in developer terms is 2 or 3 > > human weeks, so this really leaves us high and dry with no > > viable codebase for a long period of time. I'm sure for most of > > us that means backporting to 1.3, then forwardporting again to > > 1.5. That will be really unpleasant -- please don't do that! > > By reading your message, I'm under the impression that trunk will > suddenly collapse and disappear! Why do you have that feeling? > The code will remain as-is, you will still be able to work on your > projects, don't worry. > -- By reading this thread, I get the impression many wicket developers wish it would :). Let's just say at best 2.0 will be on life-support and waiting to be euthanized. The wicket developers are a creative and prolific bunch, so I'll have the added frutstration of watching many excellent new features be developed just beyond the glass in 1.x land. If that's what I wanted, I would have stayed with 1.2. I've had enough of that as I have watched 2.0be abandoned over that past month or so in favor of 1.3 regards, jim > Jean-Baptiste Quenot > aka John Banana Qwerty > http://caraldi.com/jbq/ >
