I think I have a working patch. I'll try to commit it tonight.
Eelco On 4/1/07, Jonathan Locke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
agreed on all points. Eelco Hillenius wrote: > >> increased memory consumption. > > For clarity, it doesn't consume more. Just the same, whereas the > session would consume less compared to what we have now. > >> I still think session is quite a bit better than page / threadlocal. > > I think so too, but we have to find a good way to clean it up. > Feedback messages are probably the most refactored piece in Wicket, so > we have to be careful not to fall into traps we've fallen into before. > > Eelco > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/proposal-for-feedback-messages-refactor-tf3502131.html#a9783329 Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
