btw, i'm not arguing against <wicket name = "..."
just confused by your comment about span.
Jonathan Locke wrote:
huh? what difference could an id make to rendering?
Juergen Donnerstag wrote:
I'm still thinking about the xhtml thing: <html xmlns:wicket>. http://www.htmlgoodies.com/tutors/xmlcustomtag.html shows one. Because it is valid (x)html dreamweaver should support it. I personally like the <wicket name="componentName" numberOfRows="10"> approach most. As an alternativ (not replacement) for <span id="wcn-componentName">. Someone wrote some days before that dreamweaver does not know how to display the the <wicket> tag. It does not know how to render <span id="wcn-table"> either.
Juergen
------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt _______________________________________________ Wicket-develop mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt _______________________________________________ Wicket-develop mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt _______________________________________________ Wicket-develop mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
