Unless I misunderstood what Eelco is trying to say, I disagree.
I expect the tag ID to remain the same before and after Wicket
processing, otherwise previewability will suffer. I want to use the
same CSS code with my pre-Wicket-processing code as with my
post-Wicket-processing code.

Gili

On Thu, 06 Jan 2005 20:55:12 +0100, Eelco Hillenius wrote:

>I think it is a good idea to remove them. That way you can design using 
>stylesheets using selectors like #myList on e.g. <li id="myList">. When 
>you're ready to implement the design in Wicket, you can convert to <li 
>id="wicket-myList">. As the wicket- part will be removed again, your 
>stylesheets will still address the same HTML elements.
>
>It would be +1 for making this an option in the applicationsettings 
>though, because I can imagine people argument the other way around (when 
>you let designers loose on your pages after you actually build them).
>
>Eelco
>
>
>Jonathan Locke wrote:
>
>>i wonder now if ids should have wicket- removed at all.  that might create 
>>namespace collisions with other ids in the html.  
>>
>>On Thu, 6 Jan 2005, SourceForge.net wrote:
>>
>>  
>>
>>>Bugs item #1097047, was opened at 2005-01-06 10:50
>>>Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
>>>You can respond by visiting: 
>>>https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=684975&aid=1097047&group_id=119783
>>>
>>>Category: core
>>>Group: None
>>>Status: Open
>>>Resolution: None
>>>Priority: 7
>>>Submitted By: Eelco Hillenius (eelco12)
>>>Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
>>>Summary: Id's of panels do not have wicket- removed
>>>
>>>Initial Comment:
>>>While the id's of components like labels have the
>>>wicket prefix removed (e.g. <span
>>>id="wicket-myLabel">blah</span> renders <span
>>>id="myLabel">blah</span).
>>>
>>>This is not the case for panels.
>>>
>>>E.g. <div id="wicket-header"/> will render to:
>>>
>>><div id="wicket-header"/><wicket:region name="panel"> ...
>>>
>>>while it should be:
>>>
>>><div id="header"/><wicket:region name="panel"> ...
>>>
>>>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>You can respond by visiting: 
>>>https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=684975&aid=1097047&group_id=119783
>>>
>>>
>>>-------------------------------------------------------
>>>The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
>>>Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
>>>It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Wicket-develop mailing list
>>>[email protected]
>>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
>>>
>>>    
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>-------------------------------------------------------
>>The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
>>Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
>>It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
>>_______________________________________________
>>Wicket-develop mailing list
>>[email protected]
>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
>>  
>>
>
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
>Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
>It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
>_______________________________________________
>Wicket-develop mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
>




-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
_______________________________________________
Wicket-develop mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop

Reply via email to