+1 for Wicket extensions. Not sure if I want this to be yet another seperate project though.
Eelco On 9/15/05, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > All, > > I've just played with the dojo support and found it working pretty good, > *but* ... I had immediately the need to use an other version of the dojo.js > file. > > Now this left me thinking that the libraries of dojo and scriptaculous will > probably have shorter cycles than the wicket core. I therefore propose to > move these two packages with Ajax specific handlers (and later components) > into their own libaries and give them their own release cycles. > Giving these two packages their own project will allow quick turn arounds > and specific components developed for each library. > > Note that the generic Ajax handler and support remain in Wicket core. Just > the specific library support will be extracted. > > May I have your votes please? > > Martijn > ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php _______________________________________________ Wicket-develop mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
