On Monday 19 September 2005 23:08, Martijn Dashorst wrote: > I was also thinking along this line. It is pretty clear, concise, and you'd > probably don't want to create mixed components.
Yes, don't worry about "many small jars". Personally, I love projects that has many smaller parts, each with their own (short!) release/response cycle. Otherwise, the project will slow down, and get things out the door more and more seldom, until it stalls altogether, or even worse, fork into 2 branches with hardly any releases in each. A good build system takes care of dealing with many dependencies, and transitive dependencies as well. Another advantage; It feels better/easier to hand out committership to parts of the codebase, since most active parties get into projects with a fairly narrow scope in mind. Few thoughts from a newly converted user, who is really impressed with Wicket so far. Btw, Wicket on OSGi rocks the socks off everything (reminds, need to update the web site of my latest findings in this area. Thanks for the link.) !!! Cheers Niclas ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php _______________________________________________ Wicket-develop mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
