So i think you can do that now pretty easy.
On 11/4/05, Johannes Fahrenkrug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
These are no important points, just ideas:
What about OpenLaszlo (http://www.openlaszlo.org) integration/support?
And what do you guys think about XUL support?
- Johannes.
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> All,
>
> As we just have release 1.1 I'd like to start a feature discussion on
> Wicket 1.2, and on what timeframe we wish to ship it.
>
> What are our major concerns for Wicket 1.2?
>
> I just list a few things I think could be on the feature list:
>
> - reference documentation
> - database integration
> - session size/state management
> - single component markup generation
> - portal support
> - testing
>
> I also think we should aim for some release date. I would like us to
> focus on smaller releases, and maybe strive for 4 releases per year.
> Currently we are at 2.1 releases per year. My proposal is to do
> time-boxed, feature driven development, aiming for high quality and
> less focus on more features per release. Having a schedule of 4
> releases, means releasing each 3 months. Currently a typical release
> candidate is out there for about 3 weeks, and we usually have 2
> release candidates. This means the last 6 weeks are RC time. This is
> half of a 3 month release, and seems too much IMO.
>
> Your thoughts please?
>
> Martijn
>
> --
> Living a wicket life...
>
> Martijn Dashorst - http://www.jroller.com/page/dashorst
>
> Wicket 1.1 is out: http://wicket.sourceforge.net/wicket-1.1
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. Download
it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own
Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
_______________________________________________
Wicket-develop mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
