Okay, I just realized that it was a bit dumb to post 5 megs of files
to mailing list. Sorry about that. Here are some URLs:

http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~pkulak/tapestry-benchmark.war
http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~pkulak/wicket-benchmark.war

On 7/10/05, Phil Kulak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here are the two wars. Let me know if I should change the
> functionality at all. Also, notice that I didn't try very hard to
> optimize the wicket application. For example, I don't use
> optimizeItemRemoval = true and then manually removeAll() on deletes. I
> could have done that, but there are probably corrosponding
> optimizations for Tapestry that I just don't know about because I
> don't use it. Also, the Tapestry app is totally stateless, so that may
> give it an edge, but I dunno for sure.
> 
> -Phil
> 
> On 7/10/05, Phil Kulak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If there's just one DAO, then I can store the data in a Map and not
> > worry about HSQL or anything like that. Actually, I just wrote it in
> > Wicket (it's absolutly frickin' amazing how FEW lines it took) and
> > I'll get it cloned in Tapestry tomorrow and post up both wars.
> > Basicaly, it's just a bare-bones version of your CD-App. I didn't want
> > to make it too complicated because I'm not super efficiant with
> > Tapestry and I didn't want that part to take all day.
> >
> > -Phil
> >
> > On 7/10/05, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Phil Kulak wrote:
> > >
> > > >Unless the dynamic images are actually created on the fly, Wicket's
> > > >gonna get slaughtered there since Tapestry will actually copy static
> > > >images from the jar into a public webserver directory.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > I think Wicket handles the static images pretty efficiently. It would be
> > > interesting to see if there is any performance difference with Tapestry,
> > > but I think not. So Tapestry actually copies the resources to the webapp
> > > directory? A potential problem with that is that you can't be sure that
> > > you have write rights in your webapp dir. You can't even be sure if
> > > there is a filesystem dir at all (might still be a .war, or potentially
> > > some other schema).
> > >
> > > >Maybe a list view of 50 items with edit and delete options? I could
> > > >make a single, thread-safe DAO, and then if you could find a way to
> > > >hit the page a bunch of times with concurrent edits and deletes, it
> > > >would be a nice muli-user test.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > Why should you have just one DAO? Why not an instance per request or
> > > session?
> > >
> > > >That's my idea, but I have no idea how you plan to test it, so
> > > >something else may be more appropriate.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > I think it would be nice to have a special performance test page. Where
> > > should we put it though?
> > >
> > > Eelco
> > >
> > > >On 7/9/05, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> If i get 2 wars of an app that does some big rendering (like listviews,
> > > >>dynamic images and that kind of thing)
> > > >> So i don't think hangman will do it really it is a bit to small.
> > > >>
> > > >> Don't know if we really have to test a database. That i don't like. It
> > > >>should be plain pojo's
> > > >> that are in mem created for a list/detail/edit view.
> > > >>
> > > >> What kind of functionality would be a good test?
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> johan
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> Phil Kulak wrote:
> > > >> Is this offer still available? Don't we already have a working Hangman
> > > >>app in both frameworks? If that won't cut it, I'd be glad to write a
> > > >>Tapestry clone of a Wicket app. It would give me a chance to get
> > > >>better acquainted with Tapestry 4.
> > > >>
> > > >>On 6/18/05, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> then we need 2 the same apps with the same feature set in both 
> > > >> frameworks.
> > > >>If somebody is willing to build that and supply me with the 2 wars then
> > > >>i will do a performance test
> > > >>with yourekit..
> > > >>
> > > >>johan
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>叶卫国 wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> Does anybody compare it with tapestry?
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>-------------------------------------------------------
> > > >>SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
> > > >>
> > > >> >from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
> > > >>speed, fast.
> > > >>http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
> > > >>_______________________________________________
> > > >>Wicket-user mailing list
> > > >>[email protected]
> > > >>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> -------------------------------------------------------
> > > >>SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
> > > >>from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
> > > >>informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
> > > >>speed, fast.
> > > >>http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idt77&alloc_id492&opclick
> > > >>_______________________________________________
> > > >>Wicket-user mailing list
> > > >>[email protected]
> > > >>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> N琀S^甸殜X�'矈辵辑呧�Z+a妤伶鉂j歗�)�&閞讍⿵
> > > >>?跽﹦
> > > >>5瀶{獾歙黑茩hazV瓃薭澺殨�+y┹v妤偠﹩',电!瀴h�&瑍窞、贽介韱�-y烛�
> > > >>┹5R
> > > >>璀�"沧+"�m��鹈ir壙倧莨﹑y抚j耽rG谦櫒x%娝V壣峨甔�(悍~娻zw瓎踚��鍔薼矉玵玷�咤娝l⺋)撸�"rG谦
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >N�HS^�隊X���'���u�����2��Z+a���❪�j�^�)�&�r׆��
> > > >?�թ�
> > > >5��{�쨺�ƙh��azV�z�b�ۚ��+y��v楂���',��!��h�&���~���w���޽�톋-y���
> > > >��5R 
> > > >��"�׫�+"�m����ir����ݹ�py��j��rG��ǫ����x%��V�����X���(��~��zw���i����l���q���z���l�X��)ߣ�"rG��ǫ
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -------------------------------------------------------
> > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the 'Do More With Dual!' webinar 
> > > happening
> > > July 14 at 8am PDT/11am EDT. We invite you to explore the latest in dual
> > > core and dual graphics technology at this free one hour event hosted by 
> > > HP,
> > > AMD, and NVIDIA.  To register visit http://www.hp.com/go/dualwebinar
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Wicket-user mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> > >
> >
> 
>

Reply via email to