> Eelco about tapestry: "and the templates are more flexible in use than are > Wicket's." > > Nice thing is that i just hear from a friend (and again a another friend of > his who is > a tapestry user for a long time) that they really like the pages of wicket > because > they are so flexible (dynamic) > > johan
Hey, I had to say *something* nice ;). No, what I meant - and what I should have explained better - is that what is on your pages isn't bound to the hierarchy of you components. So it is easier to shuffle them around. The downside is of course just about everything... less straightforward component cooperation, the need to configure them by either annotations or xml, etc. Eelco ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642 _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
