in all the browsers that i have to support?
I would like to have such a test html.
johan
On 5/19/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Citát Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
hmm.. that sucks. I tested in in konqueror and it worked. As far as i know
safari uses khtml. I wonder where the problem is...
-matej
> hmmm can't use it
> We have to target that shitty mac (sorry guys ;) ) and it seems that the
> default browser
> safari doesn't work as far as i could test.
>
> johan
>
>
> On 5/18/06, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > The doctype is xhtml transitional. But there's an additional comment
> > (<!-- -->) before doctype to trick IE and make it work in quirks mode.
> > (Because in standard compliance mode IE uses the W3C box model, which
> > sucks).
> > This should work with strict too. Also <?xml header would do this, but
> > wicket is kind of reluctant to print it, so i just put comment there).
> >
> > So far, this setup works (tested) for Firefox, Opera, Konqueror, IE5.0+.
> > Only thing i'm not sure with is IE7. If it won't be fooled by comment
> > before doctype and won't allow to set box-sizing in standard compliance
> > mode there will be a problem. I hope MS engineers are sane enough to
> > implement box-sizing css property, which is currently supported by any
> > decend browser (except for IE of course).
> >
> > -Matej
> >
> >
> > Johan Compagner wrote:
> > > So you are saying that it is possible to support many browser to get
> > > border-box?
> > >
> > > hmm that would solve so many problems we have...
> > >
> > > So you let IE stay in quircks mode and have for firefox that
> > > -moz-box-sizing: border-box;
> > > and for other browsers (maybe IE7) the CSS3? standard: box-sizing:
> > > border-box;
> > >
> > > What is your doctype?
> > >
> > > johan
> > >
> > >
> > > On 5/18/06, *Matej Knopp* < [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> > > > allow myself to quote...myself
> > > >
> > > > || imho, html is the best layout manager out there for browser
> > > apps. add
> > > > css to the mix and you have a great skin manager as well.
> > > >
> > > > i never said css was great for layout manager :) and yes the box
> > > model
> > > > is broken.
> > > The box model really is broken. Therefore I always stick with IE box
> > > model
> > >
> > > * {
> > > box-sizing: border-box;
> > > -moz-box-sizing: border-box;
> > > }
> > >
> > > The only thing to take care of is not to allow IE6 to work in
> > > standard-compliance mode. So far, I had no problems with this setup.
> > I'm
> > > doing quite complicated layouts using just css (no tables) and
> > > everything works fine. I just hope that IE7 won't screw everything
> > up.
> > >
> > > -Matej
> > >
> > > >
> > > > -Igor
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 5/17/06, *Johan Compagner* < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > ha! and css is easier then layout manager in java...
> > > > hmm that is not how i see it.
> > > > CSS is just plain horrible stupid box thing..
> > > >
> > > > And what is a layout manager in css? There isn't one
> > > everything is
> > > > sort of absoluut positioned and then you can do in swing also
> > > > (not recommended ofcourse)
> > > >
> > > > johan
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 5/17/06, *Igor Vaynberg* < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > imho, html is the best layout manager out there for
> > browser
> > > > apps. add css to the mix and you have a great skin
> > > manager as well.
> > > >
> > > > the one thing you always hear swing developers bitching
> > > about is
> > > > how they have to fight the layout managers to get the
> > results
> > > > they want. gridbaglayout is poweful but its a huge pain
> > > to work
> > > > with.
> > > >
> > > > matisse+grouplayout are the holy grail for swing devels,
> > its
> > > > nice and easy to create layouts. but it still requires a
> > > gui to
> > > > do this, while i can do html easily by hand. also browser
> > > screen
> > > > space doesnt translate easily to the desktop space. in
> > > desktop
> > > > space you are pixel aware, you are also pixel aware of
> > your
> > > > fonts and the south east corner of the window. in html
> > > you have
> > > > none of these things.
> > > >
> > > > look at wingS framework examples, they use layout
> > > managers. look
> > > > how rectangular their examples look.
> > > >
> > > > -Igor
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 5/17/06, *Frank Silbermann *
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>>> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I, personally, don't care for HTML, and perhaps I
> > > might enjoy
> > > > programming in Echo2 better.
> > > >
> > > > But suppose an employer maintained an HTML fragment
> > with
> > > > links to their
> > > > entire portfolio of web applications, and wanted this
> > > > fragment to appear
> > > > on every page of each web application. Since someone
> > > else is
> > > > maintaining that scrap and keeping it up-to-date, I
> > would
> > > > not want to
> > > > translate it into Echo 2 and maintain my own copy.
> > > >
> > > > Would it not likely be easier to incorporate such an
> > HTML
> > > > scrap into a
> > > > Wicket application, versus one written in a framework
> > > such
> > > > as Echo 2
> > > > that abstracted away the HTML completely?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >
> > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
> > > > [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>] On Behalf
> > > > Of Eelco
> > > > Hillenius
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 10:58 AM
> > > > To: [email protected]
> > > <mailto: [email protected]>
> > > > <mailto: [email protected]
> > > <mailto:[email protected]>>
> > > > Subject: Re: [Wicket-user] Google Web Toolkit
> > > integration ?
> > > >
> > > > > It's certainly an intriguing idea (have a look at
> > > haxe.org < http://haxe.org>
> > > > <http://haxe.org> if you find
> > > > > it interesting), ...
> > > > ...
> > > > Yeah. I see some advantages of using layout managers
> > -
> > > > basically the
> > > > same promise as Swing has - but currently I would
> > still
> > > > prefer using
> > > > HTML for layout. If I would like the GWT way of
> > > developing
> > > > applications, I would have choosen Echo 2 a long time
> > > ago.
> > > > GWT looks
> > > > like a next gen Echo to me, though with a very big
> > name
> > > > behind it, and
> > > > some cool innovations. ... Eelco
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > > > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web
> > > > services, security?
> > > > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology
> > to
> > > > make your job easier
> > > > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1
> > > based on
> > > > Apache Geronimo
> > > >
> > > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmdlnk&kid0709&bid&3057&dat1642 <
> > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmdlnk&kid0709&bid&3057&dat1642>
> > > >
> > > <
> > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmdlnk&kid%120709&bid&3057&dat%121642
> > > <
> > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmdlnk&kid%120709&bid&3057&dat%121642 >>
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Wicket-user mailing list
> > > > [email protected]
> > > <mailto:[email protected]>
> > > > <mailto: [email protected]
> > > <mailto:[email protected]>>
> > > >
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> > > <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -------------------------------------------------------
> > > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services,
> > > security?
> > > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your
> > > job easier
> > > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache
> > > Geronimo
> > >
> > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
> > > <
> > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642>
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Wicket-user mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > <mailto:[email protected]>
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
> > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job
> > easier
> > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
> > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
> > _______________________________________________
> > Wicket-user mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
> >
>
-------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
