On 8 Jun 2006, at 01:43, Timo Stamm wrote: > Are you sure this issue is that important? In my experience, Google > does > index pages with a session id parameter in the URL. The session id is > stripped in the search result URL, so I don't see any problems.
See the quotes in my previous post from Matt Cutts (Google engineer) and GoogleGuy who have both warned that if you want "maximum coverage" by Google then avoid session ids. Also, see the eamples I gave of sites that did not have their session ids stripped from the Google index. I do not know how much of a difference this will make but it is not an experiment I am able to make. It makes sense in a way though - pages in a session can be different for every user depending on how the user gets there. > Even if > there is any penalty, it is probably much more important to have good > content. My site has a lot of good content that needs to be well indexed and I depend on search engine traffic for my income so yes this is important. I think that this business model is a common one. _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user
