I also have a very big tree, and it works just fine.

The secret is to load only the data that is displayed. You need to
override the Tree class (it is made for this) and implement it so that
only the required data is loaded.


Good luck!




On Fri, 2006-07-21 at 13:46 +0800, Rice Yeh wrote:
> Hi,
>   I find that the implementation of Wicket.markup.html.tree.Tree is
> not suitable for big tree. It seems because it depends on
> javax.swing.tree.DefaultMutableTreeNode too much, which asks for
> populating the whole tree before rendering
> Wicket.markup.html.tree.Tree. For my case, the tree is very big but
> users just click on some tree paths, so I hope I can just populate the
> tree step by step. However, this seems impossible because
> Wicket.markup.html.tree.Tree renders the tree based on the 'children'
> field in javax.swing.tree.DefaultMutableTreeNode, which I populate in
> the TreeModel's method getChildCount(Object parent). But this way does
> not work. Any suggestion? 
> 
> Regards,
> Rice
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> _______________________________________________ Wicket-user mailing list 
> Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net 
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Wicket-user mailing list
Wicket-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-user

Reply via email to