Dear Professor Peter Blaha, Tran and Wien2k users,
I have computed the energy gap for Cu2O by using GGA, mBJ, and GGA+U, I got 
same energy gap of 1 eV.In principle by using mBJ, the energy gap should be 
increased close to expermimental value around 2 eV.Why mBJ is giving same value 
as GGA and it is not improved? even I tried GGA+U and the same problem and no 
thing was changed for all approximations.
I would be thankful for your suggestion and answer to solve the problem.
Sincerely yours,
Halim Said
Wien mailing list

Reply via email to