There's definitely a terrifying brainstorm down there :)
Before answering several remarks, I'd like to express a general
feeling : the success of the journal seems to depend heavily on the
editorial comittee (or whatever its name can be). It may not be the
most attractive place to be (mainly administrative and layout stuff…),
but that is what we need to set up in the first place. I am actually
volunteering to take some part in it.
Le 2 nov. 12 à 19:54, Juliana Bastos Marques a écrit :
As for any candidates for institutional academic support, I could
easily arrange for my university, Federal University of Rio de
Janeiro State (UNIRIO - http://www.unirio.br), where I've been
setting a wiki research Lab and we have a very good Library Studies
Dept., where they can help us with the setting of the journal.
Brazil has a wide experience in open-access journals (we don't have
these paywalls at all. See, e.g., http://www.scielo.org).
that's a real fine idea. I will attempt a similar initiative in my own
university, the school of communication of Paris-Sorbonne (CELSA). I
have already convinced them to set up a study day dedicated on
Wikipedia by the end of the next year, so I think they might be
interested. The shif to OA access has also been easier in France, as
most journals are published by public institutions and made most of
their archives accessible.
Le 2 nov. 12 à 23:24, Piotr Konieczny a écrit :
I like the draft design. Here's an idea on how to do tackle the
double blind peer review, wiki way:
I have added most of your suggestions on a new draft on submission
rules : http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wiki_Research_Ideas/Submission_rules
Le 3 nov. 12 à 00:44, Samuel Klein a écrit :
Hej, this is great. I think you should consider the following
combined model:
Thanks for these relevant insights. I have reported some of it on the
new submission rules draft. Besides, I have included a specific
section on « other authors » on the design model.
Le 3 nov. 12 à 00:58, Ziko van Dijk a écrit :
I wouldn't call it a "wiki journal", that gives a wrong impression,
I have transfered all the draft design on a new page, without any
reference to this name : http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wiki_Research_Ideas/Design
Le 3 nov. 12 à 11:19, Iolanda Pensa a écrit :
--> How about WIkipedia articles?
Yes, beyond traditional journal content, we could give some room to
wikimedian resources. For instance, the scientific comittee may select
some FAs that seem to be relevant with the general purpose of the issue.
PCL
_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
