Hello!

Thank you Heather for the note!. The call looks interesting to me, but I would 
suggest to add gender inclusion as a topic at the call for paper, as it is a 
central problem in Wikipedia. 

Additionally, I would encourage the organizers of Wikisym 2013 to make an extra 
effort in order to assure engaging women in the conference. In 2012, the 
organizers of Wikisym were highly predominantly male: 89% of the Symposium 
Committee, 78% of the Program Committee, and 80% of the program of speakers 
were men (according to the data provided at 
http://www.wikisym.org/ws2012/bin/view/Main/Schedule). While other 
technological related conference (such as OK Fest and Personal Democracy Forum) 
are able to engage a better gender balance (data provided here:  
http://wiki.digital-commons.net/Gender).  

In case it could he of help, this wiki collect best practices to engage women 
in technology related conferences and list of women experts: 
http://wiki.digital-commons.net/Gender

The WikiWomen's Collaborative wiki might also be a useful resource: 
http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:WikiWomen%27s_Collaborative

Thank you again. Have a nice day! Mayo

         «·´`·.(*·.¸(`·.¸ ¸.·´)¸.·*).·´`·»
«·´¨*·¸¸« Mayo Fuster Morell ».¸.·*¨`·»    @Lilaroja
          «·´`·.(¸.·´(¸.·* *·.¸)`·.¸).·´`·»

Fellow. Berkman Center for Internet and Society. Harvard University.
Researcher. Institute of Government and Public Policies. Autonomous University 
of Barcelona.
Ph.D European University Institute

Website: http://www.onlinecreation.info
________________________________________
From: [email protected] 
[[email protected]] on behalf of Heather Ford 
[[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, November 23, 2012 8:34 PM
To: Research into Wikimedia content and communities
Cc: Mark Graham
Subject: [Wiki-research-l] advice on Wikipedia topics for WikiSym 2013

Mark Graham and I are co-chairs of the Wikipedia Track at next year's WikiSym 
conference (now with added OpenSym!) and we're preparing the call for papers to 
go out Friday week. There has been such great discussion on this list in the 
past about what is currently missing from Wikipedia research that I thought I'd 
send our draft to you in case there are items that you think we might add? Our 
current suggestions below:

        • What do particular articles or groups or articles tell us about the 
norms, governance and architecture of Wikipedia and its impact on media, 
politics and the social sphere? How is information on Wikipedia being shaped by 
the materiality of Wikipedia infrastructure?

        • What is the impact of all/some of Wikipedia’s 211 language editions 
having on achieving the project’s goal to represent the “sum of all human 
knowledge”? Do smaller language editions follow the same development path as 
larger language editions? Can different representations in different languages 
tell us anything about cultural, national or regional differences?

        • What are the methodological challenges to studying Wikipedia? How are 
researchers engaging with innovative methodologies to solve some of these 
problems? How are other researchers using traditional or well-established 
methods to study Wikipedia?

        • How are wiki projects other than Wikipedia evolving? What are the 
benefits to studying other wiki projects and can comparisons and 
generalisations be made from our observations of these systems?

        • How does information contained in Wikipedia shape our understanding 
of broader social, economic, and political practices and processes? What 
theoretical frameworks in social, economic, legal and other relevant 
theoretical traditions can be applied to enrich the academic discourse on 
Wikipedia?

Also really looking forward to some great papers next year. We think that it's 
a really good thing that Wikipedia research has a separate track next year and 
we're hoping that it's going to really strengthen the quality of research. 
Looking forward to any suggestions you might have.

Best,
Heather.

Heather Ford
Oxford Internet Institute Doctoral Programme
www.ethnographymatters.net
@hfordsa on Twitter
http://hblog.org


_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l

The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which 
it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any 
review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, forwarding, or other use 
of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or 
entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited without the express 
permission of the sender. If you received this communication in error, please 
contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.



_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l

Reply via email to