Wikis are big in education, so I'm sure educational topics are welcome. There are plenty of educators.

The open collaboration track (wikis in general, not Wikipedia) may be more suitable. Alternatively, for non-reserach work, the community track.

Cheers,
Dirk



On 26.11.2012 05:05, Juliana Bastos Marques wrote:
Is there any interest on adding a topic related to Education? Sorry for
insisting on this, but I'd really like to know whether I should focus my
efforts on this group or start from the ground - in terms of congresses and
journals - in another one.

Juliana.



On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Fuster, Mayo <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Great! Thank you Heather.

    You did not make reference in your reply to it so it is difficult to know
    if you consider it, but I still think adding gender question into the call
    for papers would be a good idea.

    Thank you again. Cheers! Mayo

              «·´`·.(*·.¸(`·.¸ ¸.·´)¸.·*).·´`·»
    «·´¨*·¸¸« Mayo Fuster Morell ».¸.·*¨`·»    @Lilaroja
               «·´`·.(¸.·´(¸.·* *·.¸)`·.¸).·´`·»

    Fellow. Berkman Center for Internet and Society. Harvard University.
    Researcher. Institute of Government and Public Policies. Autonomous
    University of Barcelona.
    Ph.D European University Institute

    Website: http://www.onlinecreation.info
    ________________________________________
    From: [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    [[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>] on behalf of Heather
    Ford [[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>]
    Sent: Friday, November 23, 2012 11:32 PM
    To: Research into Wikimedia content and communities
    Cc: Mark Graham
    Subject: Re: [Wiki-research-l] advice on Wikipedia topics for WikiSym 2013

    Thank you, Mayo :)

    I think one of the problems with WikiSym - especially the research tracks
    - is that it is (mostly) an academic conference and so is almost entirely
    dependent on the academic pool (+ funding challenges etc) for
    participants. That said, we're co-located with Wikimania this year which
    means that hopefully we can draw from a larger group of practitioners and
    researchers.

    I'll definitely reach out to the WikiWomen's Collective and hopefully with
    enough time to plan ahead, we'll be able to engage more women in next
    year's event!

    Thanks again for your suggestions.

    Best,
    Heather.

    On Nov 23, 2012, at 7:57 PM, Fuster, Mayo wrote:

    Hello!

    Thank you Heather for the note!. The call looks interesting to me, but I
    would suggest to add gender inclusion as a topic at the call for paper, as
    it is a central problem in Wikipedia.

    Additionally, I would encourage the organizers of Wikisym 2013 to make an
    extra effort in order to assure engaging women in the conference. In 2012,
    the organizers of Wikisym were highly predominantly male: 89% of the
    Symposium Committee, 78% of the Program Committee, and 80% of the program
    of speakers were men (according to the data provided at
    http://www.wikisym.org/ws2012/bin/view/Main/Schedule). While other
    technological related conference (such as OK Fest and Personal Democracy
    Forum) are able to engage a better gender balance (data provided here:
    http://wiki.digital-commons.net/Gender).

    In case it could he of help, this wiki collect best practices to engage
    women in technology related conferences and list of women experts:
    http://wiki.digital-commons.net/Gender

    The WikiWomen's Collaborative wiki might also be a useful resource:
    http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:WikiWomen%27s_Collaborative

    Thank you again. Have a nice day! Mayo

             «·´`·.(*·.¸(`·.¸ ¸.·´)¸.·*).·´`·»
    «·´¨*·¸¸« Mayo Fuster Morell ».¸.·*¨`·»    @Lilaroja
              «·´`·.(¸.·´(¸.·* *·.¸)`·.¸).·´`·»

    Fellow. Berkman Center for Internet and Society. Harvard University.
    Researcher. Institute of Government and Public Policies. Autonomous
    University of Barcelona.
    Ph.D European University Institute

    Website: http://www.onlinecreation.info
    ________________________________________
    From: [email protected]
    
<mailto:[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>>
    [[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>] on behalf of Heather
    Ford [[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>]
    Sent: Friday, November 23, 2012 8:34 PM
    To: Research into Wikimedia content and communities
    Cc: Mark Graham
    Subject: [Wiki-research-l] advice on Wikipedia topics for WikiSym 2013

    Mark Graham and I are co-chairs of the Wikipedia Track at next year's
    WikiSym conference (now with added OpenSym!) and we're preparing the call
    for papers to go out Friday week. There has been such great discussion on
    this list in the past about what is currently missing from Wikipedia
    research that I thought I'd send our draft to you in case there are items
    that you think we might add? Our current suggestions below:

            • What do particular articles or groups or articles tell us about
    the norms, governance and architecture of Wikipedia and its impact on
    media, politics and the social sphere? How is information on Wikipedia
    being shaped by the materiality of Wikipedia infrastructure?

            • What is the impact of all/some of Wikipedia’s 211 language
    editions having on achieving the project’s goal to represent the “sum of
    all human knowledge”? Do smaller language editions follow the same
    development path as larger language editions? Can different
    representations in different languages tell us anything about cultural,
    national or regional differences?

            • What are the methodological challenges to studying Wikipedia?
    How are researchers engaging with innovative methodologies to solve some
    of these problems? How are other researchers using traditional or
    well-established methods to study Wikipedia?

            • How are wiki projects other than Wikipedia evolving? What are
    the benefits to studying other wiki projects and can comparisons and
    generalisations be made from our observations of these systems?

            • How does information contained in Wikipedia shape our
    understanding of broader social, economic, and political practices and
    processes? What theoretical frameworks in social, economic, legal and
    other relevant theoretical traditions can be applied to enrich the
    academic discourse on Wikipedia?

    Also really looking forward to some great papers next year. We think that
    it's a really good thing that Wikipedia research has a separate track next
    year and we're hoping that it's going to really strengthen the quality of
    research. Looking forward to any suggestions you might have.

    Best,
    Heather.

    Heather Ford
    Oxford Internet Institute Doctoral Programme
    www.ethnographymatters.net
    <http://www.ethnographymatters.net><http://www.ethnographymatters.net>
    @hfordsa on Twitter
    http://hblog.org


    _______________________________________________
    Wiki-research-l mailing list
    [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l

    The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
    which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
    material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution,
    forwarding, or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon,
    this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient
    is prohibited without the express permission of the sender. If you
    received this communication in error, please contact the sender and delete
    the material from any computer.



    _______________________________________________
    Wiki-research-l mailing list
    [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l

    Heather Ford
    Oxford Internet Institute Doctoral Programme
    www.ethnographymatters.net
    <http://www.ethnographymatters.net><http://www.ethnographymatters.net>
    @hfordsa on Twitter
    http://hblog.org

    The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
    which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
    material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution,
    forwarding, or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon,
    this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient
    is prohibited without the express permission of the sender. If you
    received this communication in error, please contact the sender and delete
    the material from any computer.



    _______________________________________________
    Wiki-research-l mailing list
    [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l




--
www.domusaurea.org <http://www.domusaurea.org>


_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l


--
Website: http://dirkriehle.com - Twitter: @dirkriehle
Ph (DE): +49-157-8153-4150 - Ph (US): +1-650-450-8550


_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l

Reply via email to