Is there any interest on adding a topic related to Education? Sorry for
insisting on this, but I'd really like to know whether I should focus my
efforts on this group or start from the ground - in terms of congresses and
journals - in another one.

Juliana.



On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Fuster, Mayo <[email protected]> wrote:

> Great! Thank you Heather.
>
> You did not make reference in your reply to it so it is difficult to know
> if you consider it, but I still think adding gender question into the call
> for papers would be a good idea.
>
> Thank you again. Cheers! Mayo
>
>          «·´`·.(*·.¸(`·.¸ ¸.·´)¸.·*).·´`·»
> «·´¨*·¸¸« Mayo Fuster Morell ».¸.·*¨`·»    @Lilaroja
>           «·´`·.(¸.·´(¸.·* *·.¸)`·.¸).·´`·»
>
> Fellow. Berkman Center for Internet and Society. Harvard University.
> Researcher. Institute of Government and Public Policies. Autonomous
> University of Barcelona.
> Ph.D European University Institute
>
> Website: http://www.onlinecreation.info
> ________________________________________
> From: [email protected] [
> [email protected]] on behalf of Heather Ford [
> [email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, November 23, 2012 11:32 PM
> To: Research into Wikimedia content and communities
> Cc: Mark Graham
> Subject: Re: [Wiki-research-l] advice on Wikipedia topics for WikiSym 2013
>
> Thank you, Mayo :)
>
> I think one of the problems with WikiSym - especially the research tracks
> - is that it is (mostly) an academic conference and so is almost entirely
> dependent on the academic pool (+ funding challenges etc) for participants.
> That said, we're co-located with Wikimania this year which means that
> hopefully we can draw from a larger group of practitioners and researchers.
>
> I'll definitely reach out to the WikiWomen's Collective and hopefully with
> enough time to plan ahead, we'll be able to engage more women in next
> year's event!
>
> Thanks again for your suggestions.
>
> Best,
> Heather.
>
> On Nov 23, 2012, at 7:57 PM, Fuster, Mayo wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> Thank you Heather for the note!. The call looks interesting to me, but I
> would suggest to add gender inclusion as a topic at the call for paper, as
> it is a central problem in Wikipedia.
>
> Additionally, I would encourage the organizers of Wikisym 2013 to make an
> extra effort in order to assure engaging women in the conference. In 2012,
> the organizers of Wikisym were highly predominantly male: 89% of the
> Symposium Committee, 78% of the Program Committee, and 80% of the program
> of speakers were men (according to the data provided at
> http://www.wikisym.org/ws2012/bin/view/Main/Schedule). While other
> technological related conference (such as OK Fest and Personal Democracy
> Forum) are able to engage a better gender balance (data provided here:
> http://wiki.digital-commons.net/Gender).
>
> In case it could he of help, this wiki collect best practices to engage
> women in technology related conferences and list of women experts:
> http://wiki.digital-commons.net/Gender
>
> The WikiWomen's Collaborative wiki might also be a useful resource:
> http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:WikiWomen%27s_Collaborative
>
> Thank you again. Have a nice day! Mayo
>
>         «·´`·.(*·.¸(`·.¸ ¸.·´)¸.·*).·´`·»
> «·´¨*·¸¸« Mayo Fuster Morell ».¸.·*¨`·»    @Lilaroja
>          «·´`·.(¸.·´(¸.·* *·.¸)`·.¸).·´`·»
>
> Fellow. Berkman Center for Internet and Society. Harvard University.
> Researcher. Institute of Government and Public Policies. Autonomous
> University of Barcelona.
> Ph.D European University Institute
>
> Website: http://www.onlinecreation.info
> ________________________________________
> From: [email protected]<mailto:
> [email protected]> [
> [email protected]] on behalf of Heather Ford [
> [email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, November 23, 2012 8:34 PM
> To: Research into Wikimedia content and communities
> Cc: Mark Graham
> Subject: [Wiki-research-l] advice on Wikipedia topics for WikiSym 2013
>
> Mark Graham and I are co-chairs of the Wikipedia Track at next year's
> WikiSym conference (now with added OpenSym!) and we're preparing the call
> for papers to go out Friday week. There has been such great discussion on
> this list in the past about what is currently missing from Wikipedia
> research that I thought I'd send our draft to you in case there are items
> that you think we might add? Our current suggestions below:
>
>        • What do particular articles or groups or articles tell us about
> the norms, governance and architecture of Wikipedia and its impact on
> media, politics and the social sphere? How is information on Wikipedia
> being shaped by the materiality of Wikipedia infrastructure?
>
>        • What is the impact of all/some of Wikipedia’s 211 language
> editions having on achieving the project’s goal to represent the “sum of
> all human knowledge”? Do smaller language editions follow the same
> development path as larger language editions? Can different representations
> in different languages tell us anything about cultural, national or
> regional differences?
>
>        • What are the methodological challenges to studying Wikipedia? How
> are researchers engaging with innovative methodologies to solve some of
> these problems? How are other researchers using traditional or
> well-established methods to study Wikipedia?
>
>        • How are wiki projects other than Wikipedia evolving? What are the
> benefits to studying other wiki projects and can comparisons and
> generalisations be made from our observations of these systems?
>
>        • How does information contained in Wikipedia shape our
> understanding of broader social, economic, and political practices and
> processes? What theoretical frameworks in social, economic, legal and other
> relevant theoretical traditions can be applied to enrich the academic
> discourse on Wikipedia?
>
> Also really looking forward to some great papers next year. We think that
> it's a really good thing that Wikipedia research has a separate track next
> year and we're hoping that it's going to really strengthen the quality of
> research. Looking forward to any suggestions you might have.
>
> Best,
> Heather.
>
> Heather Ford
> Oxford Internet Institute Doctoral Programme
> www.ethnographymatters.net<http://www.ethnographymatters.net>
> @hfordsa on Twitter
> http://hblog.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wiki-research-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
>
> The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
> which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
> material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution,
> forwarding, or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this
> information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is
> prohibited without the express permission of the sender. If you received
> this communication in error, please contact the sender and delete the
> material from any computer.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wiki-research-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
>
> Heather Ford
> Oxford Internet Institute Doctoral Programme
> www.ethnographymatters.net<http://www.ethnographymatters.net>
> @hfordsa on Twitter
> http://hblog.org
>
> The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
> which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
> material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution,
> forwarding, or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this
> information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is
> prohibited without the express permission of the sender. If you received
> this communication in error, please contact the sender and delete the
> material from any computer.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wiki-research-l mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
>



-- 
www.domusaurea.org
_______________________________________________
Wiki-research-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l

Reply via email to