> > When that kind of roadblock gets put in the path of innovation, we're > already ossified.
That's an interesting opinion. It seems that you are suggesting that the problem is not recoverable. How do you know that is true? Presumably the WMF have a plan for when people wake up and realise the > only way to innovate is to fork the entire infrastructure and > community, but I'll confess to not understanding what it is. To my knowledge, we have no safes with letters written by Jimmy containing contingency plans for when Wikipedia comes crashing down. On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Stuart A. Yeates <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 2:42 AM, Aaron Halfaker > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > One strategy to make some change here would be to find a way to measure > the > > amount of lost quality/productivity caused by aggressive application of > > rules and a lack of consideration for newcomers. > > When that kind of roadblock gets put in the path of innovation, we're > already ossified. > > Presumably the WMF have a plan for when people wake up and realise the > only way to innovate is to fork the entire infrastructure and > community, but I'll confess to not understanding what it is. > > cheers > stuart > > _______________________________________________ > Wiki-research-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l >
_______________________________________________ Wiki-research-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wiki-research-l
