https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19416
--- Comment #13 from Happy-melon <happy-me...@live.com> 2009-07-03 13:07:37
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> > Semantically, it makes a lot of sense for Geshi's output to be wrapped in a
> > pre.
>
> No it doesn't. If you want to be semantic, we should be using <code> (see
> w3.org). While <pre> is for <pre>formatted text.
It makes more sense than a semantically-meaningless div. But meh...
> This puts /each line/ in a <pre>.
How wierd. However, the current appearance on enwiki seems to be as desired;
only the outer border is displayed on FF3.5 at least.
> Please, go open a separate bug for that (making geshi borders
> fake a pre style as before, or actually output a <pre>), it will probably be
> "upstream" though.
>
> For the last time, this bug is about a non-pre omni-skin border. There is
> plenty of room for a separate bug for your desires. Do I have to open it for
> you?
>
I'd rather do that than get into more of an argument, certainly. I personally
think that it's more important to actually solve the underlying issue
("undesirable lack of borders in Geshi output") than to spend time correctly
pidgeonholeing the various ways we could do so. As you say, since they're not
mutually exclusive methods, it may be clearer for them to be in separate bugs;
although we then lose all the context of the comments above. But meh again...
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
