https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56346
--- Comment #32 from TMg <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #30) > What's the plan for this bug? I wonder why you are asking this question. There is no "plan". For the average Bugzilla report it's often like "ignore it long enough to make the users give up and stop complaining about, then pretend there is no problem". It doesn't even matter if a report is almost 10 years old and received 50 votes (e.g. bug 674). There is no developer assigned and there are no developers to assign. WMF always moves them to the next project in the moment a feature is deployed. Sometimes the original developers even left WMF. If you are lucky a volunteer will make a pull request. I really, really don't understand why such bad changes aren't reverted (which would be simple), fixed (which may be hard) and deployed again (which is again simple). It's like WMF is more afraid of reverting something than being criticized for making bad changes. Why is that? I'm sorry, Andre, I'm just trying to explain what many users actually think. Reports like this are just tips of the iceberg. (In reply to comment #31) > ULS master has hinting added for the Autnym font. What about excluding the Wikidata link from using the font? What about excluding all Latin languages from using a font they don't need? What about delivering the font only to browsers that would show rectangles otherwise? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
