https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56346

Eduard Braun <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[email protected]

--- Comment #37 from Eduard Braun <[email protected]> ---
I share the opinion of many others:

Autonym is actually
a) a fix for a problem that most people never experienced.
b) making thinks even worse as they would have been without ULS and Autonym in
the first place


The whole sad story from my point of view:

Common sense dictates that users have fonts installed for their native
languages. If they work multilingual they're most likely do also have all fonts
necessary for those languages installed on their system. On top of that we can
assume that on all modern systems there's support for even more languages that
a normal user never ever needs anyway.

Against this common sense ULS was designed to load webfonts for a huge bunch of
languages. Therefore we started to load additional font support for every
Wikipedia user, even if it was most unlikely that a user actually needed it.

It turned out, that ULS was detrimental to performance. The additional traffic
due to webfonts loading seems to have been so large, that even WMF saw the need
for a change (I'm quite sure WMF would not have even cared to develop Autonym
if it had only affected client performance).

Now we have Autonym, which brings all sorts of problems, including the
extremely bad rendering we're discussing in this bug...
And now we're trying hardly to fix font rendering of Autonym (which will by
definition never be as good as a native font like Arial on Windows), because we
put much effort into Autonym, which was a fix for the bad performance for ULS,
which was a huge project supported by WMF which was supposed to fix problems
and add features... that users never faced and seldom requested!


The whole thing seems pretty messed up to me, like many things that come from
WMF lately. Since I see Siebrand Mazeland is active on this bug (who is the
"Product Manager Language Engineering" of the WMF after all and therefore
probably the one in charge for everything we're discussing here): Think about
the doubts many users have about ULS, Autonym and all the other new language
features. And think about why there are no users praising ULS, while there are
tons of users facing problems with ULS and everything that is connected to
it... I don't want to blame you for doing a bad job - but I'm afraid there is
definitely room for improvement right now!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Wikibugs-l mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l

Reply via email to