https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56433
Erik Moeller <e...@wikimedia.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
--- Comment #10 from Erik Moeller <e...@wikimedia.org> ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> I suppose my comment was ambiguous. Do you think UniversalLanguageSelector
> (ULS) is currently in good enough shape, with acceptable performance for
> Wikimedia wikis?
I do think it's fine to keep ULS deployed and to iteratively improve it, so
closing as WONTFIX (if new information surfaces that justifies at least a
discussion about that option, feel free to reopen).
I have requested that we continue to assess ways to reduce the footprint of the
autonym font - it's small but it's loaded in some situations where it may not
need to be (e.g. only Latin characters).
Longer term, we should get more data to further optimize when we deliver fonts
for content, as they're a huge payload with sometimes dubious benefit, but
again, I don't think those issues are severe of frequent enough to warrant
scaling back deployment. There may be more severe issues experienced in
communities of specific languages where fonts are delivered by default, but
those should be tracked separately.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
