--- Comment #6 from Isarra <> ---
A major issue with LESS right now seems to be that there are many things that
can be done with either LESS or RL directly. This leads to messiness and
inconsistency, because there don't seem to be any standards as to which is
better for what, despite each being better for some things than the other.

I say this because while you can, using LESS functions for this would get very
messy very quickly, and at that point it'd be far more practical to just write
out the number. But this is something where RL could handle everything in the
background, and neatly, without the user having to do anything special. It just
happens and everything works.

That's what we want - less to have to think about, not more.

You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Wikibugs-l mailing list

Reply via email to