--- Comment #15 from Erik Moeller <e...@wikimedia.org> ---
I think everyone agrees that the communication about the single-page test
wasn't sufficient. But I don't think the LQT comparison is valid. LQT comes
with a rather scary per-page flag allowing any page to be LQT-enabled, and the
discussions you're pointing to refer to enabling LQT across Meta.
Flow has no such flag right now - pages are manually and carefully selected for
testing purposes, and effects truly are pretty limited. This deploy enabled a
page called "Developer test page". So this analogy seems _very_ stretched, and
the arguments seem theoretical at this point. What practical concerns are there
with the current test page deploy?
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Wikibugs-l mailing list