https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70351
Quiddity <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #20 from Quiddity <[email protected]> --- If I understand correctly, Isarra is suggesting there should be an alternative UI option, which uses the previous/classic styling. Secondly, she is suggesting that the "classic styling" should be the default shipped with mediawiki for re-users, at least until such time as MW UI is a cohesive and complete implementation of the total overhaul that it eventually aims to be. (i.e. when many more of the cards in https://trello.com/b/EXtVTJxJ/mediawiki-ui are complete) (In reply to Bartosz Dziewoński from comment #5) > I was under the impression that MediaWiki UI, while geared towards Vector, > is supposed to be reasonably neutral and usable with most skins. Admittedly, > they're completely unlike default buttons styles on every OS I've ever seen. Indeed. Some mediawiki users will prefer the OS style defaults. Those OS styles are inconsistent with each other, but the users of each distinct OS will be used to the visuals. E.g. A corporate intranet using mediawiki, might dislike having experimental interface changes, and red and green and blue controls, suddenly a part of their interface, when they're used to plain white and gray or shiny-blue. [Does Mac still rock the shiny-blue? Ah, yup still aqua. (Tangent: https://developer.apple.com/library/mac/documentation/UserExperience/Conceptual/AppleHIGuidelines/Controls/Controls.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/TP30000359-TP6 Hmm, similarities in ChromeOS. http://www.chromium.org/chromium-os/user-experience/ui-elements and the "still trying" MS http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/windows/desktop/dn742399.aspx and Gnome's too (spread across dozens of subpages >.< ) https://developer.gnome.org/hig-book/stable/controls.html.en and android https://developer.android.com/guide/topics/ui/controls.html )] (In reply to Matthew Flaschen from comment #12) > This requires the 'default' thing I mentioned earlier, which I'll try to do > soon, since it doesn't actually hurt anything (even if no one actually makes > a skin-specific MW UI). (In reply to Matthew Flaschen from comment #19) > You have not proposed a concrete implementation of MW UI (other than none at > all, which I am not convinced of) that you think core should ship with. If I'm correct about all of the above (unlikely!) she's hoping for that 'default' thing, at least until the MW UI overhaul is further along. HTH. :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
