Eloquence added a comment. @MZMcBride There's nothing wrong with that URL for (a link to) the wiki version, but it shouldn't be used for a static microsite because any /wiki/ URL can be reasonably expected to point to, well, a wiki page. Since we're going to set up a non /wiki/ URL for it, we may as well pick one which is easy to remember and re-use.
The subject of whether this should be done as a microsite or not is a bit out of scope for this request, but from my POV the modus operandi right now is that I'm fine with such sites provided that - there is a wiki version for translation - it's used for static documents that are unlikely to change after publication - there is no CMS or custom code other than some lightweight JavaScript Essentially, it's an alternative to publication as PDF, which was the previous //modus operandi// for annual reports. The arguments in favor, in a nutshell, are purpose-built design that's easily outsourced, without dealing with the complexity of a CMS (MediaWiki or otherwise). The above checklist should be considered "necessary, but not sufficient" justification for a static site, i.e. we may still decide against greenlighting other cases that satisfy it. TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T599 REPLY HANDLER ACTIONS Reply to comment or attach files, or !close, !claim, !unsubscribe or !assign <username>. To: Eloquence Cc: wikibugs-l, Heather, Jorm, Eloquence, Krenair, jeremyb, MZMcBride _______________________________________________ Wikibugs-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikibugs-l
