--- Comment #14 from MF-Warburg <> ---
(In reply to James Forrester from comment #11)
> (In reply to MZMcBride from comment #10)
> > (In reply to James Forrester from comment #9)
> > > It's the C, not the L, part of LCA that will mostly care, as it trivially
> > > impacts community audit requirements.
> > 
> > Aha, thanks for the clarification!
> > 
> > I can sign off on the community part. ;-)
> I'm sorry, I missed the part where you are the responsible party for making
> sure community leaders like arbitration committee and their ilk are aware of
> changes that affect core community requirements.

What are community leaders? Afaik the community has no such form of government.
If you think that the only arbcom one can imagine to come to complain about a
software change by virtue of being an arbcom will complain about this, why
don't you simply inform it? And why don't you just add someone from the LCA
department as cc?

You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Wikibugs-l mailing list

Reply via email to