James Alexander <> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
                 CC|                            |

--- Comment #16 from James Alexander <> ---
(In reply to James Forrester from comment #9)
> (In reply to MZMcBride from comment #8)
> > (In reply to James Forrester from comment #7)
> > > Semi-+1 from a Product perspective; I'd recommend that LCA get flagged (at
> > > the very least) first before considering it a +2.
> > 
> > LCA presumably refers to [[wmf:LCA]]. Can you expand on why involvement from
> > the LCA group is recommended here? Are you worried about editing disclaimer
> > text? I'm having difficulty imagining user pages or global (wikifarm-wide)
> > bits and pieces being a legal issue (we've had both for a very long
> > time...), but then again, I'm not a lawyer!
> It's the C, not the L, part of LCA that will mostly care, as it trivially
> impacts community audit requirements.

I +1 :) it's something that we've wanted for ages and the (all non blocking)
concerns I brought up with lego are already mostly covered. Some people will be
confused at first but the page banner (which I agree is better on top, easier
to see) will help with that and something like this does not deserve a CN
banner. God I wish we had the ability to do custom echo notifications easier.

You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Wikibugs-l mailing list

Reply via email to