daniel added a comment.

  @Christopher I don't see why we shouldn't use wikidata URIs as CRS 
identifiers.  However, I agree that Q2 and Q111 are too unspecific to be used 
as a coordinate system. We would want to use something like  Q11902211.
  
  This points out a problem in our use of the "reference globe" in the 
GlobeCoordinate data type: the intention was to specify the exact datum used. 
But in practice, this is often not known to the people who enter the 
coordinates, and not stated in their source either. Also, when querying by 
location, we typically want to filter by celestial body (earth, moon, mars, 
etc), not by coordinate system.
  
  I do not think we should use a different data type for non-earth coordinates. 
We would need to duplicate all coordinate properties (location-earth, 
location-mars, etc). We might however choose to allow the globe and the CRS to 
be specified separately in the GlobeCoordinate data value. That will make it 
even more difficult to represent the value meaningfully with a single literal 
for the simple mapping.

TASK DETAIL
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T129072

EMAIL PREFERENCES
  https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/

To: daniel
Cc: daniel, Smalyshev, Christopher, Aklapper, debt, Gehel, D3r1ck01, FloNight, 
Izno, jkroll, Wikidata-bugs, Jdouglas, aude, Deskana, Manybubbles, Mbch331



_______________________________________________
Wikidata-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs

Reply via email to